Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 28, 2015 12:24:22 GMT
kane would cost far far too much, levy would want 50 million and thats no joke. the only dimension walcott adds is in the physio room. honestly good when fit but thats the problem right there, next season will be bigger than this so we need fit and reliable troops. as for otamendi at 18 million even 20 its a good deal as he adds some steel and experience however at the buyout clause he can stay where he is. no.1 transfer target should be adding 4 years onto de gea's contract and if he really wants to go throw in a 40 million buyout clause What are we, accountants? Someone smarter than me should know if Kane is the real deal or not. If he is sign him up.
|
|
|
Post by ManicRed on Mar 28, 2015 13:03:14 GMT
We really been linked with Theo Walcott 26 year old english lad.. i don't see it myself. Wouldn't say no but he could spend more time in the injury room than playing
|
|
_
United School Boy
Posts: 0
|
Post by _ on Mar 28, 2015 13:09:06 GMT
We really been linked with Theo Walcott 26 year old english lad.. i don't see it myself. Wouldn't say no but he could spend more time in the injury room than playing He's exactly the sort of player we need .. if fit ... and would cost virtually bugger all (compared to others) - and he's home grown too
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 28, 2015 13:18:54 GMT
Fucking hell. From Giggs, Beckham and Ronaldo to Walcott. All the no
|
|
|
Post by CaajScot on Mar 28, 2015 13:58:04 GMT
We really been linked with Theo Walcott 26 year old english lad.. i don't see it myself. Wouldn't say no but he could spend more time in the injury room than playing He would be good on the bench or a few games in the under 21's. That's about it. Too injury prone for me, that's why they want rid of him.
|
|
|
Post by Monty on Mar 28, 2015 14:20:30 GMT
If we're losing 2 strikers this summer (Falcao almost certainly, and maybe van Persie too), then I wouldn't object to us signing Walcott as on of the replacements, as long as we get a proper #9 as well.
|
|
|
Post by CaajScot on Mar 28, 2015 14:35:32 GMT
If we're losing 2 strikers this summer (Falcao almost certainly, and maybe van Persie too), then I wouldn't object to us signing Walcott as on of the replacements, as long as we get a proper #9 as well. Still too injury prone for me. But if we did go for him and then maybe LVG would get the best out of him. I hope Falcao stays. I get all depressed when people say he could be on his way, I still like the guy.
|
|
|
Post by Stew on Mar 28, 2015 16:28:29 GMT
You all need to jump onboard the Lacazette express.
|
|
.
United School Boy
Posts: 0
|
Post by . on Mar 28, 2015 16:32:09 GMT
We really been linked with Theo Walcott 26 year old english lad.. i don't see it myself. Wouldn't say no but he could spend more time in the injury room than playing Can't see why we'd be remotely interested in Walcott. It's late March bullshit from the rags. Column filler.
|
|
.
United School Boy
Posts: 0
|
Post by . on Mar 28, 2015 18:21:58 GMT
Goddamn we do not need Walcott. We already have Wilson who is far better and far younger than Walcott, and what we need to complement that line is another proven goal-scoring machine, not an injury-prone over-hyped Arsenal reject.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 28, 2015 19:45:57 GMT
You all need to jump onboard the Lacazette express. And promptly disembark the Walcott choo choo
|
|
|
Post by rederictheking on Mar 28, 2015 20:32:34 GMT
Bale just looked very happy when the utd rumour was mentioned, he said you never know and smiled the journos will be all over it Tomo
|
|
|
Post by Monty on Mar 28, 2015 20:44:22 GMT
Bale just looked very happy when the utd rumour was mentioned, he said you never know and smiled the journos will be all over it Tomo MUPPET MODE ACTIVATED!
|
|
|
Post by wolvesred on Mar 28, 2015 21:00:10 GMT
kane would cost far far too much, levy would want 50 million and thats no joke. the only dimension walcott adds is in the physio room. honestly good when fit but thats the problem right there, next season will be bigger than this so we need fit and reliable troops. as for otamendi at 18 million even 20 its a good deal as he adds some steel and experience however at the buyout clause he can stay where he is. no.1 transfer target should be adding 4 years onto de gea's contract and if he really wants to go throw in a 40 million buyout clause Thats the trouble i think according to many reports he will sign but if madrid calls he wants to leave, and doesnt want a buyout clause in. If he hasnt signed by the summer we should sell him. Doesnt matter what player it is they shouldnt hold the club to ransom. Hes a very good player but if his hearts not in it long term then we should sell.
|
|
|
Post by Stew on Mar 28, 2015 22:31:49 GMT
Those Bale quotes are fake.
|
|