|
Post by Coogie on Aug 22, 2015 18:48:58 GMT
Just scored a free kick!!!! Was good remembering when fkn rooney scored eh
|
|
|
Post by Moodymanc on Aug 24, 2015 10:18:42 GMT
Thread for Griezzy but no thread for Muller?
Anyways it could happen.
Atletico Raised their buyout clause to £58m. They could be expecting a huge panic Bid from some where.
|
|
|
Post by ZlattackRed on Aug 24, 2015 10:20:18 GMT
Thread for Griezzy but no thread for Muller? Anyways it could happen. Atletico Raised their buyout clause to £58m. They could be expecting a huge panic Bid from some where. Can that be done midway? New contract signed by Griezmann?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 24, 2015 10:20:41 GMT
Thread for Griezzy but no thread for Muller? Anyways it could happen. Atletico Raised their buyout clause to £58m. They could be expecting a huge panic Bid from some where. Can that be done midway? New contract signed by Griezmann? Was reported early last week
|
|
|
Post by ZlattackRed on Aug 24, 2015 10:27:32 GMT
Can that be done midway? New contract signed by Griezmann? Was reported early last week Okay. Pardon my ignorance, but can a new buy out be inserted without signing a new deal? And If yes, we look like fools in DDG's case
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 24, 2015 10:29:54 GMT
Was reported early last week Okay. Pardon my ignorance, but can a new buy out be inserted without signing a new deal? And If yes, we look like fools in DDG's case I think it was a new deal. Even if it was inserted in an existing contract, it would still require the players agreement, and would therefore just be an updated contract, rather than a new, extended one. All guess work from me though.
|
|
|
Post by ZlattackRed on Aug 24, 2015 10:36:45 GMT
Okay. Pardon my ignorance, but can a new buy out be inserted without signing a new deal? And If yes, we look like fools in DDG's case I think it was a new deal. Even if it was inserted in an existing contract, it would still require the players agreement, and would therefore just be an updated contract, rather than a new, extended one. All guess work from me though. So, he is either doing a favour to Atletico or has no intention of leaving this term. In any case, makes the transfer more difficult for us.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 24, 2015 10:37:57 GMT
I think it was a new deal. Even if it was inserted in an existing contract, it would still require the players agreement, and would therefore just be an updated contract, rather than a new, extended one. All guess work from me though. So, he is either doing a favour to Atletico or has no intention of leaving this term. In any case, makes the transfer more difficult for us. Pretty much, I've not really looked into the details of it. Maybe Rustin Cohle is the man to ask...
|
|
|
Post by ratbag on Aug 24, 2015 10:38:27 GMT
I think it was a new deal. Even if it was inserted in an existing contract, it would still require the players agreement, and would therefore just be an updated contract, rather than a new, extended one. All guess work from me though. So, he is either doing a favour to Atletico or has no intention of leaving this term. In any case, makes the transfer more difficult for us. No it doesn't - LvG said before - he has a buyout so if you want him just f*cking pay it...that really isn't so hard...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 24, 2015 10:41:00 GMT
So, he is either doing a favour to Atletico or has no intention of leaving this term. In any case, makes the transfer more difficult for us. No it doesn't - LvG said before - he has a buyout so if you want him just f*cking pay it...that really isn't so hard... It's not, He meant the increased fee makes it more difficult, which is true when it's added 25 mil or whatever onto it, and we don't seem to understand the concept of buy-out clauses
|
|
|
Post by swimmityswim on Aug 24, 2015 10:43:12 GMT
Okay. Pardon my ignorance, but can a new buy out be inserted without signing a new deal? And If yes, we look like fools in DDG's case I think it was a new deal. Even if it was inserted in an existing contract, it would still require the players agreement, and would therefore just be an updated contract, rather than a new, extended one. All guess work from me though. let's ask that twitter lawyer
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 24, 2015 10:44:17 GMT
I think it was a new deal. Even if it was inserted in an existing contract, it would still require the players agreement, and would therefore just be an updated contract, rather than a new, extended one. All guess work from me though. let's ask that twitter lawyer Reply would be along the lines of : "Maybe, maybe not, you decide"
|
|
|
Post by swimmityswim on Aug 24, 2015 10:45:04 GMT
No it doesn't - LvG said before - he has a buyout so if you want him just f*cking pay it...that really isn't so hard... It's not, He meant the increased fee makes it more difficult, which is true when it's added 25 mil or whatever onto it, and we don't seem to understand the concept of buy-out clauses i agree with ratbag, it's no more difficult. more expensive sure, but it's the same process. pay offer buy-out clause, negotiate with player, sign contracts, keep new great player on the bench so rooney can start. simples
|
|
|
Post by troubleontheway on Aug 24, 2015 10:47:09 GMT
I think it was a new deal. Even if it was inserted in an existing contract, it would still require the players agreement, and would therefore just be an updated contract, rather than a new, extended one. All guess work from me though. let's ask that twitter lawyer Just did that for you mate. Here's his response: "Sometimes, it is better to interrogate the chihuahua you can see, rather than the llama that may or may not be an atheist. #its_a_process". Make of that what you will.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 24, 2015 10:47:29 GMT
It's not, He meant the increased fee makes it more difficult, which is true when it's added 25 mil or whatever onto it, and we don't seem to understand the concept of buy-out clauses i agree with ratbag, it's no more difficult. more expensive sure, but it's the same process. pay offer buy-out clause, negotiate with player, sign contracts, keep new great player on the bench so rooney can start. simples I meant more difficult in the sense that if yesterday you could of bought a Sausage roll from Greggs for 80p, but didn't, then went tomorrow and it was £3, I'd be conflicted
|
|