Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 7, 2018 21:20:35 GMT
My cousin from Portugal texted me yesterday and told be that in a match between Boavista FC vs Desportivo das Aves for Primeira Liga, a flag stood on the way of the VAR. I looked up on YouTube and my god this is appalling. When not implemented correctly, you'll get something like this. The main problem with the VAR is that people put it as the ultimate end of football injustices which is not true. Football is a game of people, and people make mistakes. No technology will change that. The best you can achieve is less mistakes.  Fucks sake. "Boavista concedes an allegedly offside goal, VAR cannot disallow it due to a Boavista fan waving his flag and inadvertedly blocking the camera" streamable.com/phm4x#SMEAGOLED! |
|
|
|
VAR
Feb 7, 2018 21:24:55 GMT
via mobile
Post by WhatsTheMata on Feb 7, 2018 21:24:55 GMT
My cousin from Portugal texted me yesterday and told be that in a match between Boavista FC vs Desportivo das Aves for Primeira Liga, a flag stood on the way of the VAR. I looked up on YouTube and my god this is appalling. When not implemented correctly, you'll get something like this. The main problem with the VAR is that people put it as the ultimate end of football injustices which is not true. Football is a game of people, and people make mistakes. No technology will change that. The best you can achieve is less mistakes. Fucks sake. "Boavista concedes an allegedly offside goal, VAR cannot disallow it due to a Boavista fan waving his flag and inadvertedly blocking the camera" streamable.com/phm4x#SMEAGOLED! I JUST DELETED IT Can't believe you were quicker than me! Anyways, cousin said that the flagsman was near. This was sheer incompetence, very Portuguese-esque |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 8, 2018 0:01:07 GMT
The main problem with the VAR is that people put it as the ultimate end of football injustices which is not true. Football is a game of people, and people make mistakes. No technology will change that. The best you can achieve is less mistakes. The Nani red card would have still been given a red card but sometimes the injustices that can still hurt years later are actually a cool part of the game. People will deny it but recalling a wrong decision years later and getting mad over it is so football. Would Jose be our manager now If they had got the offside decision right against Porto? I doubt it. I don't remember many of the decision that went for us when they shouldn't but there will have been loads of them. I remember so many that went against us. It creates memories & emotions & that's what the game is about. Just sort out the really obvious ones & leave us to complain about the contentious ones without stopping the game for 5 minutes at a time. |
|
|
|
VAR
Feb 8, 2018 0:59:39 GMT
Bestie likes this
Post by WhatsTheMata on Feb 8, 2018 0:59:39 GMT
The main problem with the VAR is that people put it as the ultimate end of football injustices which is not true. Football is a game of people, and people make mistakes. No technology will change that. The best you can achieve is less mistakes. The Nani red card would have still been given a red card but sometimes the injustices that can still hurt years later are actually a cool part of the game. People will deny it but recalling a wrong decision years later and getting mad over it is so football. Would Jose be our manager now If they had got the offside decision right against Porto? I doubt it. I don't remember many of the decision that went for us when they shouldn't but there will have been loads of them. I remember so many that went against us. It creates memories & emotions & that's what the game is about. Just sort out the really obvious ones & leave us to complain about the contentious ones without stopping the game for 5 minutes at a time. And I would add that even obvious ones sometimes aren't caught. For instance, Bellarabi should have been given a red on the first Bayern vs Leverkusen but even with the VAR, the card was not shown. |
|
|
|
VAR
Feb 18, 2018 17:17:11 GMT
Post by CaajScot on Feb 18, 2018 17:17:11 GMT
FA Cup: Hawkeye apologizes over wrong VAR image for Juan Mata 'goal'
9 minutes ago|FA Cup The 'squiggly line' image shown by broadcasters was not used to disallow Juan Mata's goal in Manchester United's FA Cup fifth-round win at Huddersfield, says the provider of VAR pictures.
Hawkeye says a "technical error led to an incorrect graphic being provided". Mata said "the decision was not very clear", while United boss Jose Mourinho called for the video assistant referee (VAR) system to be made "perfect". The system is being trialed in the FA Cup and Carabao Cup this season. It was praised after correctly overturning a decision to rule out Kelechi Iheanacho's strike for Leicester in their 2-0 FA Cup third-round replay win over Fleetwood in January. However, it was also described as a "shambles" by former England captain Alan Shearer after the system's use failed to result in a penalty for Chelsea during their FA Cup replay with Norwich. On Saturday, Mata appeared to have put Manchester United 2-0 up just before the break when he ran on to Ashley Young's neat pass - but while the visiting team was celebrating, referee Kevin Friend listened to his earpiece for the VAR input. After a wait of around a minute, the goal was ruled out for offside, with viewers watching the match live on BT Sport then presented with the faulty graphic. Hawkeye's statement read: "A technical error led to an incorrect graphic being provided by Hawkeye to BT Sport on Saturday. "To confirm, the VAR saw the correct image with the correct lines to make the decision. This was a case of the wrong image being provided to the broadcaster and we apologize." Belgian striker Romelu Lukaku scored in each half for United. www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/43106899
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 18, 2018 19:29:42 GMT
FA Cup: Hawkeye apologizes over wrong VAR image for Juan Mata 'goal'
9 minutes ago|FA Cup The 'squiggly line' image shown by broadcasters was not used to disallow Juan Mata's goal in Manchester United's FA Cup fifth-round win at Huddersfield, says the provider of VAR pictures.
Hawkeye says a "technical error led to an incorrect graphic being provided". Mata said "the decision was not very clear", while United boss Jose Mourinho called for the video assistant referee (VAR) system to be made "perfect". The system is being trialed in the FA Cup and Carabao Cup this season. It was praised after correctly overturning a decision to rule out Kelechi Iheanacho's strike for Leicester in their 2-0 FA Cup third-round replay win over Fleetwood in January. However, it was also described as a "shambles" by former England captain Alan Shearer after the system's use failed to result in a penalty for Chelsea during their FA Cup replay with Norwich. On Saturday, Mata appeared to have put Manchester United 2-0 up just before the break when he ran on to Ashley Young's neat pass - but while the visiting team was celebrating, referee Kevin Friend listened to his earpiece for the VAR input. After a wait of around a minute, the goal was ruled out for offside, with viewers watching the match live on BT Sport then presented with the faulty graphic. Hawkeye's statement read: "A technical error led to an incorrect graphic being provided by Hawkeye to BT Sport on Saturday. "To confirm, the VAR saw the correct image with the correct lines to make the decision. This was a case of the wrong image being provided to the broadcaster and we apologize." Belgian striker Romelu Lukaku scored in each half for United. www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/43106899 Bullshit |
|
|
|
VAR
Feb 26, 2018 19:37:30 GMT
Post by CaajScot on Feb 26, 2018 19:37:30 GMT
VAR: Uefa will not use system in next season's Champions League
3 hours ago|European Football Video assistant referees (VAR) will not be used in next season's Champions League, with the head of Uefa saying he sees "a lot of confusion".
The International Football Association Board, which rules on the game's laws, meets on Saturday to decide whether to approve the technology permanently. If it does, then Fifa is committed to using the system at the World Cup. But Uefa president Aleksander Ceferin said: "Fans see the VAR screen all the time but nobody knows how it works." He added: "We will not use it in the Champions League next season. "For me, it might be a good project but we shouldn't rush it." An Ifab report last month said that the VAR system has been accurate in 98.9% of decisions so far during its two-year worldwide trial. In England, VAR has been used in selected matches in the FA Cup. It has also been used in the Carabao Cup, where it featured in Sunday's final, with Arsenal manager Arsene Wenger unhappy that it did not rule out Manchester City's second goal. Fifa president Gianni Infantino said on Monday that he continued to support the use of the system, which has been trialed across 20 competitions over the past two years, at this summer's World Cup finals in Russia. He said: "If we, or I, can do something to make sure that the World Cup is not decided by a referee's mistakes, then I think it's our duty to do it." www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/43202295
|
|
|
|
VAR
Mar 1, 2018 10:45:32 GMT
Post by CaajScot on Mar 1, 2018 10:45:32 GMT
VAR: 'Comical' & 'embarrassing' review system criticised after FA Cup replay
1 March 2008|FA Cup
It was described as "comical" by former Tottenham midfielder Jermaine Jenas, while Spurs boss Mauricio Pochettino said he felt "sorry for the referee". It's fair to say the video assistant referee (VAR) made quite an impact on Wednesday...... www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/43234569How it happened - the main VAR reviewsSeven minutes: Fernando Llorente protects the ball for Erik Lamela, who is able to tap into the net. Referee Paul Tierney consults VAR for about a minute before the decision is made that Llorente fouled Rochdale's Harrison McGahey in the build-up.
22: Spurs winger Lucas Moura breaks into the box, dribbles past a couple of defenders and goes down under apparent contact from McGahey. It goes to review for a minute before it is decided there was minimal contact and no penalty is awarded.
23: Son's right-footed strike gives Tottenham the lead but there is yet another delay while VAR checks there is no reason to disallow the goal. The original decision stands.
25: Kieran Trippier is fouled by Rochdale's Matt Done and a free-kick is awarded. There is a delay before VAR decides the offence continued into the penalty area.
29: Son scores the penalty for Spurs but Tierney blows his whistle immediately and addresses VAR. Son is shown a yellow card and is deemed to have 'feinted' in the run-up to his spot-kick. The goal is overturned and a free-kick is awarded to Rochdale.
31: Rochdale's Stephen Humphrys equalises after he is played in by Andrew Cannon but there is another short delay while VAR checks there is no reason to disallow the goal.
45+5: A tackle by Erik Lamela on Callum Camps earns the Tottenham midfielder a yellow card but Tierney consults VAR to confirm whether a red card should be shown. The decision to award a yellow card stands.
47: Llorente scores and VAR is checked to ensure there is no reason to overturn the decision. The goal is awarded.
53: VAR is consulted yet again as Llorente scores Tottenham's third goal.
65: There is another brief delay as Tottenham's fifth goal - Son's second - is checked by VAR. The goal stands.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bestie on Mar 1, 2018 11:58:34 GMT
Stinks of a sackless coward of a referee more than a fault with VAR to be honest.
|
|
|
|
VAR
Mar 1, 2018 14:25:19 GMT
via mobile
Post by Karma on Mar 1, 2018 14:25:19 GMT
Var should be an aid for the referee , it shouldn't take over his judgement generally.
Clear and obvious decisions not every little thing.
The problem is football is so micro anylysed now nobody wants to accept that refs are human and do make mistakes. The two offsides against Huddersfield and Chelsea were both marginal and should have been allowed to stand based on the refs judgement.
I'm sure the offside rule wasn't invented for pundits to argue which part of the body is offside. I think common sense needs to be used here.
Var should be used for the blooper type wrong decisions.
|
|
|
|
Post by king nothing on Mar 1, 2018 15:37:10 GMT
Var should be an aid for the referee , it shouldn't take over his judgement generally. Clear and obvious decisions not every little thing. The problem is football is so micro anylysed now nobody wants to accept that refs are human and do make mistakes. The two offsides against Huddersfield and Chelsea were both marginal and should have been allowed to stand based on the refs judgement. I'm sure the offside rule wasn't invented for pundits to argue which part of the body is offside. I think common sense needs to be used here. Var should be used for the blooper type wrong decisions. I don't like the faceless official looking at it. How can someone who is potentially hundreds of miles from the ground decide the outcome of an incident. It should be at the side of the pitch. Ref runs straight over, has a look, make the decision and get on with the game. What happens if the link with the monitor goes down mid way through reviewing an incident? Do 75,000 people and countless millions around the world have to wait until comms is restored? Not to mention players then stood around wondering what the hell is happening and warming down. The set up needs to improve if it is to be used all the time. At the moment its a farce. |
|
|
|
Post by Tatty on Mar 7, 2018 14:42:26 GMT
VAR is shite. If it' brought in permanently, I am done with football.
|
|
|
|
VAR
Mar 23, 2018 9:54:42 GMT
Post by Rustin Cohle on Mar 23, 2018 9:54:42 GMT
|
|
|
|
VAR
Apr 13, 2018 13:03:20 GMT
Post by CaajScot on Apr 13, 2018 13:03:20 GMT
Video assistant referee: Premier League clubs vote against VAR for 2018-19
9 minutes ago|Premier League Premier League clubs have voted not to use the video assistant referee (VAR) system for next season.
More to follow. Edit: 14:16 The clubs agreed that advanced testing on the use of the video technology will continue to the end of 2018-19. Premier League officials want the system to be implemented for FA Cup and League Cup matches again next term. There were some notable high-profile problems with the new technology when it was used for matches in this season's FA Cup. How does VAR work? In Manchester United's victory at Huddersfield in the last 16 of the FA Cup, for example, on-screen lines used to adjudicate on an offside decision were curved and distorted. Clubs also want improvement to communication inside the stadium and for TV viewers. www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/43755203
|
|
|
|
Post by Tatty on Apr 13, 2018 14:10:56 GMT
Yaaaaaaay!
Now vote against it for life.
|
|
Fucks sake.
"United’s flag is deepest red, it shrouded all our Munich dead. Before their limbs grew stiff and cold, their heart’s blood dyed it’s ev’ry fold. Then raise United’s banner high, beneath it’s shade we’ll live and die. So keep the faith and never fear." 
