|
Post by ScholesEvilTwin on Nov 7, 2018 10:05:09 GMT
Who else would have a title if they did?? The dirty scouse. Exactly. Forget what extra titles we might get, wouldn't be worth it if they get one.
|
|
|
Post by Sméagol on Nov 7, 2018 10:09:25 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Rustin Cohle on Nov 7, 2018 10:33:06 GMT
The only downside to it all is if they do what they did to Juve and strip the titles away...... Its unthinkable. Punish them going forward! But, but, 21! 22! 2011/12 and 2017/18.
|
|
|
Post by Rustin Cohle on Nov 7, 2018 10:34:04 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Karma on Nov 7, 2018 10:56:26 GMT
The only downside to it all is if they do what they did to Juve and strip the titles away...... Its unthinkable. Punish them going forward! Kick them out of the CL for starters.
|
|
|
Post by Karma on Nov 7, 2018 10:59:45 GMT
How far does this go back? When they won their first trophy? I imagine Pep wouldn't be hanging around very long if they got stripped of trophies? In fact I wonder if these allegations aren't already making him consider his next destination?
|
|
|
Post by Bestie on Nov 7, 2018 11:16:48 GMT
The only downside to it all is if they do what they did to Juve and strip the titles away...... Its unthinkable. Punish them going forward! Who else would have a title if they did?? The dirty scouse. Never mind.
|
|
|
Post by kstandhand on Nov 7, 2018 11:23:09 GMT
Thats the one
|
|
|
Post by Tatty on Nov 7, 2018 11:29:18 GMT
Punishment should start from last season, only.
|
|
|
Post by kstandhand on Nov 7, 2018 11:58:27 GMT
How far does this go back? When they won their first trophy? I imagine Pep wouldn't be hanging around very long if they got stripped of trophies? In fact I wonder if these allegations aren't already making him consider his next destination? Read the Der Speigel's ,leak today,the "media management team' will probably already be suggesting to certain publications,that they should not go big on it,if it had been a UK based publication that had run the investiagtion,it might have even seen the light of day.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 7, 2018 12:05:01 GMT
This will all be nothing.
|
|
|
Post by Karma on Nov 7, 2018 12:08:24 GMT
I would take a Scouse title if it meant getting City's from last season.
21 >19.
Stripping City of those titles would have far reaching consequences imo which would benefit both us and football in general.
A small price to pay.
|
|
|
Post by Karma on Nov 7, 2018 12:21:37 GMT
This will all be nothing. I disagree. Their perfectly choreographed PR outfit will take a big hit from this. Any doubts that anyone has that this is a legitimate business has gone. Only city fans and some sychophantic Journos have any respect for them now. The image they have tried to peddle has had an almighty dump on it. Remember their owner isn't here because he likes football, at least Chelsea's owner can't be accused of having no interest. This is all about creating a PR away from the horrors of what these owners represent. This has exposed what many of us already suspected. I wouldn't be surprised either if some of their players are getting a tidy sum of money channelled elsewhere so the club can peddle this idea that they won't be held to ransom on wages. Just look at the smear campaign when we signed Sanchez.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 7, 2018 12:27:45 GMT
This will all be nothing. I disagree. Their perfectly choreographed PR outfit will take a big hit from this. Any doubts that anyone has that this is a legitimate business has gone. Only city fans and some sychophantic Journos have any respect for them now. The image they have tried to peddle has had an almighty dump on it. Remember their owner isn't here because he likes football, at least Chelsea's owner can't be accused of having no interest. This is all about creating a PR away from the horrors of what these owners represent. This has exposed what many of us already suspected. I wouldn't be surprised either if some of their players are getting a tidy sum of money channelled elsewhere so the club can peddle this idea that they won't be held to ransom on wages. Just look at the smear campaign when we signed Sanchez. In a few weeks it won't even be talked about. City don't give a shit.
|
|
|
Post by Karma on Nov 7, 2018 13:10:09 GMT
I disagree. Their perfectly choreographed PR outfit will take a big hit from this. Any doubts that anyone has that this is a legitimate business has gone. Only city fans and some sychophantic Journos have any respect for them now. The image they have tried to peddle has had an almighty dump on it. Remember their owner isn't here because he likes football, at least Chelsea's owner can't be accused of having no interest. This is all about creating a PR away from the horrors of what these owners represent. This has exposed what many of us already suspected. I wouldn't be surprised either if some of their players are getting a tidy sum of money channelled elsewhere so the club can peddle this idea that they won't be held to ransom on wages. Just look at the smear campaign when we signed Sanchez. In a few weeks it won't even be talked about. City don't give a shit. I wouldn't be too sure of that. City certainly give a shit about their PR, it's why they rolled up in the first place.
|
|