|
Post by Tatty on Feb 9, 2019 13:29:35 GMT
I wouldn't touch Rabiot with a 10' pole. Good player, and someone who could give Matic a game off from time to time. But he's not good enough to risk dealing with his attitude and other baggage. If he was good enough to kick us on from top 4 challengers to title challengers, then he would be worth it. But he's not. He’d play instead of Herrera.
|
|
|
Post by Monty on Feb 9, 2019 13:35:54 GMT
I wouldn't touch Rabiot with a 10' pole. Good player, and someone who could give Matic a game off from time to time. But he's not good enough to risk dealing with his attitude and other baggage. If he was good enough to kick us on from top 4 challengers to title challengers, then he would be worth it. But he's not. He’d play instead of Herrera. If that's the case, I'd rather just start Herrera and keep the 250k a week for somebody else. Herrera is better in that role than Raboit would be, anyway.
|
|
|
Post by Kamilo on Feb 9, 2019 13:59:31 GMT
He’d play instead of Herrera. If that's the case, I'd rather just start Herrera and keep the 250k a week for somebody else. Herrera is better in that role than Raboit would be, anyway. Erikssen!
|
|
|
Post by redcase on Feb 9, 2019 14:09:25 GMT
If that's the case, I'd rather just start Herrera and keep the 250k a week for somebody else. Herrera is better in that role than Raboit would be, anyway. Erikssen! Not in the position Herrera plays in.
|
|
|
Post by Karma on Feb 9, 2019 14:59:59 GMT
If that's the case, I'd rather just start Herrera and keep the 250k a week for somebody else. Herrera is better in that role than Raboit would be, anyway. Erikssen! We couldn't even get Toby, Erickson isn't happening! We don't need another summer chasing players that aren't happening. If there's one thing Woowar needs to learn.
|
|
|
Post by Rustin Cohle on Feb 9, 2019 15:07:25 GMT
Eriksen's a hell of a player but he's not what we need.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 9, 2019 20:47:53 GMT
Toby, Wan-Bissaka and Rabiot for 50 million combined leaves plenty of cash for a top RW
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 9, 2019 20:53:24 GMT
Toby, Wan-Bissaka and Rabiot for 50 million combined leaves plenty of cash for a top RW Does Wan Bissaka have a release clause because youre being very generous there
|
|
|
Post by bushy1987 on Feb 9, 2019 20:56:47 GMT
Toby, Wan-Bissaka and Rabiot for 50 million combined leaves plenty of cash for a top RW I'd take all 3 off those, and then the kid from lyon
|
|
|
Post by Monty on Feb 9, 2019 20:56:59 GMT
Toby, Wan-Bissaka and Rabiot for 50 million combined leaves plenty of cash for a top RW I doubt we'd get AWB for less than 50.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 9, 2019 21:30:42 GMT
Toby, Wan-Bissaka and Rabiot for 50 million combined leaves plenty of cash for a top RW I doubt we'd get AWB for less than 50. 50 million? We got Dalot for 20 and he was supposed to be one of the top prospects in Europe, wasn’t he?
|
|
|
Post by Monty on Feb 9, 2019 21:41:04 GMT
I doubt we'd get AWB for less than 50. 50 million? We got Dalot for 20 and he was supposed to be one of the top prospects in Europe, wasn’t he? Dalot had a release clause. For AWB, we can add home grown tax, media darling tax, long contract tax, bidding war tax, Palace don't need to sell tax, Man Utd tax... 50m might be understating it. He's one of the breakout players of the season. There's no way he'd be cheap. Same situation as it was with Shaw, who cost 35 odd million before the market went nuts. If 18 year old Shaw was having a breakout season now, he'd be going for 50+ as well.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 9, 2019 21:51:53 GMT
50 million? We got Dalot for 20 and he was supposed to be one of the top prospects in Europe, wasn’t he? Dalot had a release clause. For AWB, we can add home grown tax, media darling tax, long contract tax, bidding war tax, Palace don't need to sell tax, Man Utd tax... 50m might be understating it. He's one of the breakout players of the season. There's no way he'd be cheap. Same situation as it was with Shaw, who cost 35 odd million before the market went nuts. If 18 year old Shaw was having a breakout season now, he'd be going for 50+ as well. You’re being a Daniel Levy here... 35 million tops or 34.5 million + Alexis
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 9, 2019 22:02:50 GMT
Dalot had a release clause. For AWB, we can add home grown tax, media darling tax, long contract tax, bidding war tax, Palace don't need to sell tax, Man Utd tax... 50m might be understating it. He's one of the breakout players of the season. There's no way he'd be cheap. Same situation as it was with Shaw, who cost 35 odd million before the market went nuts. If 18 year old Shaw was having a breakout season now, he'd be going for 50+ as well. You’re being a Daniel Levy here... 35 million tops or 34.5 million + Alexis Hes really not. The market is mental. An incredibly young English right back who is playing very well, for a club with no financial issues who definitely wont be going down. 35 million would be seen as fantastic business. Arsenal might get away with it, but I would be amazed if we got quoted anything under 50.
|
|
|
Post by Stew on Feb 9, 2019 22:04:47 GMT
I’d be giving Dortmund whatever they want for Sancho.
|
|