|
|
Post by Kamilo on Mar 13, 2024 20:11:13 GMT
SELL!
|
|
|
|
Post by keanosdog16 on Mar 13, 2024 20:26:01 GMT
Hopefully he has a good euros and then gets the move and we get a bog fee, top player on his day, but unfortunately those days just are not regular enough, the move will be best for both parties. He won’t make the euros that’s the problem |
|
|
|
Post by Stretty on Mar 13, 2024 20:59:43 GMT
Mirror reporting that PSG want Rashford for £75m. Any takers to drive him to the airport? i will hire him a limousine out of my own pocket. |
|
|
|
Post by Paul on Mar 13, 2024 22:28:30 GMT
I was delighted we signed Hojlund and stood by him even during his dry spell. Sadly I thought Antony was going to be excellent for us. I also thought Amrabat would be a good signing so will hold my hands up. Quite a lot of us did. However, most of us thought Mount was a decent player but not needed at all. Some people thought he was a good buy as he’d show Bruno up. Which didn’t go well. As pointed out above, I’m not employed in football and I’d expect someone who is to be a far better judge than me. Whist I do hold Ten Hag partially responsible, if it wasn't for the shite above him he wouldn't have had to rely on desperate loanee signings in the first place. On a few occasions the purse strings have been tightened with a vice grip. He's his part to play but he's not exactly getting the support from above either. People can bang on about money wasted but this has literally nothing to do with Ten Hag. He requests the players but overspending is not down to him. Had we had a competent structure in place things may have done differently. People will disagree but this is why I'd like to see him get one season under INEOS. He has to improve, no denying that. But I think with a good enough structure above him he'll do much better. |
|
|
|
Post by alwaysUnited on Mar 14, 2024 6:02:00 GMT
Trying to replace Mbappe with Rashford. I almost feel for them.
|
|
|
|
Post by Stretty on Mar 14, 2024 6:33:35 GMT
I was delighted we signed Hojlund and stood by him even during his dry spell. Sadly I thought Antony was going to be excellent for us. I also thought Amrabat would be a good signing so will hold my hands up. Quite a lot of us did. However, most of us thought Mount was a decent player but not needed at all. Some people thought he was a good buy as he’d show Bruno up. Which didn’t go well. As pointed out above, I’m not employed in football and I’d expect someone who is to be a far better judge than me. He's his part to play but he's not exactly getting the support from above either. People can bang on about money wasted but this has literally nothing to do with Ten Hag. He requests the players but overspending is not down to him. Had we had a competent structure in place things may have done differently. People will disagree but this is why I'd like to see him get one season under INEOS. He has to improve, no denying that. But I think with a good enough structure above him he'll do much better. He’s spent 400 million and turned us into a mid table team with a 0 goal difference in march. Bar 2 or 3 his signings have been shite. his tactics and in game management are generally shite. There are teams that have a fraction of our budget that play far better football and look better coached than we do. We all know the glazers are cunts but he has had money and has authorised most of these shit signings we now need to move on. let’s acting like a big club and not tolerate mediocrity(at a club like Real Madrid he would have been sacked the day after that 0-7 at the Scouse). |
|
|
|
Post by Karma on Mar 14, 2024 9:50:16 GMT
Whist I do hold Ten Hag partially responsible, if it wasn't for the shite above him he wouldn't have had to rely on desperate loanee signings in the first place. On a few occasions the purse strings have been tightened with a vice grip. He's his part to play but he's not exactly getting the support from above either. People can bang on about money wasted but this has literally nothing to do with Ten Hag. He requests the players but overspending is not down to him. Had we had a competent structure in place things may have done differently. People will disagree but this is why I'd like to see him get one season under INEOS. He has to improve, no denying that. But I think with a good enough structure above him he'll do much better. He’s spent 400 million and turned us into a mid table team with a 0 goal difference in march. Bar 2 or 3 his signings have been shite. his tactics and in game management are generally shite. There are teams that have a fraction of our budget that play far better football and look better coached than we do. We all know the glazers are cunts but he has had money and has authorised most of these shit signings we now need to move on. let’s acting like a big club and not tolerate mediocrity(at a club like Real Madrid he would have been sacked the day after that 0-7 at the Scouse). Yeah that game was the start of it for me. |
|
|
|
Post by Stew on Mar 14, 2024 14:34:44 GMT
I was delighted we signed Hojlund and stood by him even during his dry spell. Sadly I thought Antony was going to be excellent for us. I also thought Amrabat would be a good signing so will hold my hands up. Quite a lot of us did. However, most of us thought Mount was a decent player but not needed at all. Some people thought he was a good buy as he’d show Bruno up. Which didn’t go well. As pointed out above, I’m not employed in football and I’d expect someone who is to be a far better judge than me. He will show Bruno up, but for that 2 things need to happen - Stay fit and convince ETH to play him over Bruno. Both unlikely. I honestly think he is a good player. There isn’t a hope in hell he’ll show Bruno up. Just never going to happen. |
|
|
|
Post by seanie on Mar 14, 2024 15:18:01 GMT
Hopefully he has a good euros and then gets the move and we get a bog fee, top player on his day, but unfortunately those days just are not regular enough, the move will be best for both parties. He won’t make the euros that’s the problem He's in the squad going to the Euros, but he probably won't make much of an impact or start much. He never did in the past anyway |
|
|
|
Post by anti_social on Mar 14, 2024 18:43:44 GMT
On the Bruno v Mount thing, although they should occupy the same or similar positions in midfield they're totally different players. I can't see Mount ever being a like-for-like replacement for Bruno, esp as Bruno is a far better footballer. I could maybe see Mount fitting in better than Bruno in an entirely different system which doesn't tolerate the kind of autonomy (lack of discipline) that is afforded to Bruno, but given that we still have nothing approaching a recognisable styyle of play, let alone a well-drilled system relying on postional discipline, this won't happen any time soon. All of which makes the purchase of Mount even more piuzzling.
|
|
|
|
Post by Paul on Mar 14, 2024 20:49:42 GMT
The only way Bruno and Mount work I'd if you play one of them as a No.8. Bruno is never unfit and Mount is nowhere near the level Bruno is. I can understand in terms of his energy but that alone isn't enough to justify a very odd signing.
|
|
|
|
Post by keanosdog16 on Mar 15, 2024 14:59:31 GMT
Rashford not for sale according to Erik! Thant would be another poor decision Erik my friend, hopefully it’ll be taken out of his hands!
|
|
|
|
Post by DedRevil on Mar 15, 2024 17:10:18 GMT
Rashford not for sale according to Erik! Thant would be another poor decision Erik my friend, hopefully it’ll be taken out of his hands! Can see his point, we'll miss his purple patch in 3 years time. |
|
|
|
Post by seanie on Mar 15, 2024 17:16:23 GMT
Rashford not for sale according to Erik! Thant would be another poor decision Erik my friend, hopefully it’ll be taken out of his hands! He's not for sale, because no team is buying him now and paying those wages or higher! 375K pw plus the huge commercial endorsements for being a United player. He's going nowhere, may as well get behind him and just hope he has much better seasons ahead. We won't get a bid for Sancho either this year. I think the hope is we agree better terms on a further loan with Dortmund and sell him next year if he has a good season |
|
|
|
Post by Karma on Mar 15, 2024 23:07:42 GMT
Rashford not for sale according to Erik! Thant would be another poor decision Erik my friend, hopefully it’ll be taken out of his hands! Sell and upgrade. Unless we want to stay rooted where we are. In an elite team he’s on the bench. United have made him their star player. |
|
