|
|
Post by karthy on Jul 9, 2012 15:06:41 GMT
5m for Sturridge is crazy. Worth a punt. defo worth a punt ,but not sure if we can offer him regular play and at his age that's what he would be looking for. Besides i always felt that he'd rather go for glory all himself than look at team play IMO |
|
|
|
Post by Ole's Red Whiteknight03 Army on Jul 9, 2012 15:26:22 GMT
Chicharito, Welbeck, Rooney > Sturridge, but 5m for a fourth striker with decent premiership experience? Absolutely, I'd take him.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bestie on Jul 9, 2012 15:34:59 GMT
I'd absolutely take Sturridge for £5 million. We'd have 3 English strikers and a foreign super-sub. Last time that happened, we won everything. . .
(Unfortunately, yes, I'm banking on Berbs to be off-loaded to some rich club soon.)
|
|
|
|
Post by Jayrannasaurus on Jul 10, 2012 6:45:28 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by redcase on Jul 10, 2012 7:35:28 GMT
Nothing on the credible sources so far, I'm going to wait for some official news. How much money did Chelsea make from winning the Champions League , anybody know? Cos they operate in losses, yet they would have spent 70 million on players if Oscar is also true.
|
|
|
|
Post by redcase on Jul 10, 2012 7:53:45 GMT
Sky says no offers in from Chelsea or Spurs.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kamilo on Jul 10, 2012 11:00:56 GMT
I'd dabble to say Sturridge has a better outside the box rip than chica and welbeck but our boys are far far better with their movement and finishing.
|
|
|
|
Post by jimbonda on Jul 10, 2012 19:35:17 GMT
I'd absolutely take Sturridge for £5 million. We'd have 3 English strikers and a foreign super-sub. who's this foreign super sub? we signed someone while i nipped out of the house? rooney > sturridge chico > sturridge welbeck > sturridge and i rate sturridge, would have taken him to the euros. but he's not better than either of these 3 and he's not better than valencia when he plays wide right. on top of that he's recently played for city and the rents and is reckoned to have a bit of an attitude. |
|
|
|
Post by tommyred on Jul 10, 2012 19:40:01 GMT
Nobody is asking who the 3rd English striker was then?
Because I know somebody who played for us at that time who definitely wasn't English.
|
|
|
|
Post by jimbonda on Jul 10, 2012 19:47:58 GMT
i think he'd av meant 4 good strikers including a super sub rather than the bit about 3 of em being english
|
|
|
|
Post by tommyred on Jul 10, 2012 19:50:38 GMT
Confusingly worded if so. He didn't even say 3 good just 3 English lol.
Sturridge seems a twat to me though, and I'd agree he's worse than all of our current forwards.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bestie on Jul 11, 2012 0:27:54 GMT
Confusingly worded if so. He didn't even say 3 good just 3 English lol. Sturridge seems a twat to me though, and I'd agree he's worse than all of our current forwards. Look, I didn't want to just come out and say "2 black dudes, a white guy, and a furr'ner. . ." okay?! So I counted Yorkie as English. @ jim - Hernandez is the foreign super-sub, obviously. But Sturridge would be on the bench beside him like. |
|
|
|
Post by redcase on Jul 11, 2012 4:58:38 GMT
Sturridge still has meningitis, let the poor lad get rid of it at least before thinking about making him 4th striker. Scary thing though, meningitis.
|
|
|
|
Post by redcase on Jul 11, 2012 8:33:26 GMT
Apparently Welbeck's contract negotiations have hit a snag. Not good. (The Sun)
Also, Fergie was spotted in London, so The Sun has made the automatic assumption that he is there to sign RVP.
Also talk of an official 20 million bid for Moura from Daily Mirror.
|
|
|
|
Post by jimbonda on Jul 11, 2012 10:28:09 GMT
@ jim - Hernandez is the foreign super-sub, obviously. But Sturridge would be on the bench beside him like. i think there's more to chicos future at the club than a super sub. i think he should be utilised more than that meaning plenty of starts. sturridge shouldn't get on our bench |
|
