|
|
Post by RAZ on Mar 14, 2018 17:53:38 GMT
Yeah, that's my job. Bloody newbies coming in here stealing our jobs. Build a wall!! That's racist, us snowflakes don't like it. I'd prefer to be called a rainbownewforummember instead of newbie if you don't mind :-D oh believe me,he does mind |
|
|
|
Post by WhatsTheMata on Mar 14, 2018 18:06:21 GMT
Yeah, that's my job. Bloody newbies coming in here stealing our jobs. Build a wall!! That's racist, us snowflakes don't like it. I'd prefer to be called a rainbownewforummember instead of newbie if you don't mind :-D We are going to deport you. |
|
|
|
Post by GeniusCantona on Mar 14, 2018 18:55:59 GMT
Simeone is Jose part 2. He is also about results rather than playing style. Jardim from Monoco would be my top choice based on the level he had them playing last year with their very young team.
|
|
|
|
Post by GeniusCantona on Mar 14, 2018 19:03:11 GMT
Simeone is Jose part 2. He is also about results rather than playing style. Jardim from Monoco would be my top choice based on the level he had them playing last year with their very young team. Should also add that Martial played very well under him for one year. Jose has done OK with McTominay and Rashford but he values experience in big games. If we want to build a perennial long-term winner again, we have to let them play in these big matches. |
|
|
|
Post by Sméagol on Mar 14, 2018 19:07:23 GMT
Simeone is Jose part 2. He is also about results rather than playing style. Jardim from Monoco would be my top choice based on the level he had them playing last year with their very young team. Not that I'm a big fan of Simeone, but United should be about results rather than playing style too. You ideally want both, yes. |
|
|
|
Post by GeniusCantona on Mar 14, 2018 19:19:39 GMT
Simeone is Jose part 2. He is also about results rather than playing style. Jardim from Monoco would be my top choice based on the level he had them playing last year with their very young team. Not that I'm a big fan of Simeone, but United should be about results rather than playing style too. You ideally want both, yes. 100% agree but we watch football and United in particular for the style of football as well. Fergie's teams were exciting and played attacking football but we understood at times when we had to be more pragmatic and defensive for the result re: 2008 semi against Barca. We also grinded out 1 nil games during our best seasons. Results mattered but it was a joy watching our team. Yesterday seems to be the boiling point for a lot of our supporters. Jose doesn't get it nor does he care. |
|
|
|
Post by Ole's Red Whiteknight03 Army on Mar 15, 2018 3:08:49 GMT
I hear there’s a Ken from Scotland who likes attacking football. Wonder what he’s up to?
|
|
|
|
Post by Tatty on Mar 16, 2018 7:57:41 GMT
Marcelinho at Valencia? His Villarreal side were dreamy and he's turned around that shambles at Valencia.
|
|
|
|
Post by ScholesEvilTwin on Mar 16, 2018 8:23:57 GMT
How is the Nice manager doing?
|
|
|
|
Post by Karma on Mar 16, 2018 8:29:44 GMT
Simeone is Jose part 2. He is also about results rather than playing style. Jardim from Monoco would be my top choice based on the level he had them playing last year with their very young team. Not that I'm a big fan of Simeone, but United should be about results rather than playing style too. You ideally want both, yes. Simeone is probably the most obvious choice especially considering he's the closest to what we've already got now. I don't think completely going against your current style is the logical way to go either. He's been making positive noises about us in the press. Sounds like he's not interested in Chelsea anyway. He might ruffle a few of the snowflakes in our fan base mind ( which is a thumbs up from me). I dont want to get a manager with a possession based style similar to Pep, Van Gaal. It leaves me cold. Spurs probably have the best mix of tactics, entertaining but pretty good defensively. That's not me shouting out for Poch but that's the kind of football which is closer to what I like. |
|
|
|
Post by Sméagol on Mar 16, 2018 8:38:59 GMT
Not that I'm a big fan of Simeone, but United should be about results rather than playing style too. You ideally want both, yes. Simeone is probably the most obvious choice especially considering he's the closest to what we've already got now. I don't think completely going against your current style is the logical way to go either. He's been making positive noises about us in the press. Sounds like he's not interested in Chelsea anyway. He might ruffle a few of the snowflakes in our fan base mind ( which is a thumbs up from me). I dont want to get a manager with a possession based style similar to Pep, Van Gaal. It leaves me cold. Spurs probably have the best mix of tactics, entertaining but pretty good defensively. That's not me shouting out for Poch but that's the kind of football which is closer to what I like. I'd like a manager that would make us play like Citeh right now. They're far more direct than his Barca side. Doesn't make him less of a cunt, but no reason to deny the truth. |
|
|
|
Post by Karma on Mar 16, 2018 8:51:40 GMT
Simeone is probably the most obvious choice especially considering he's the closest to what we've already got now. I don't think completely going against your current style is the logical way to go either. He's been making positive noises about us in the press. Sounds like he's not interested in Chelsea anyway. He might ruffle a few of the snowflakes in our fan base mind ( which is a thumbs up from me). I dont want to get a manager with a possession based style similar to Pep, Van Gaal. It leaves me cold. Spurs probably have the best mix of tactics, entertaining but pretty good defensively. That's not me shouting out for Poch but that's the kind of football which is closer to what I like. I'd like a manager that would make us play like Citeh right now. They're far more direct than his Barca side. Doesn't make him less of a cunt, but no reason to deny the truth. I find City quite boring to watch. If Pool could sort their midfield and defence out they are a much more entertaining outfit although it pains me to say it. I don't know why City's style of play is so lauded. Pep's Barca used to send me to sleep too. Give me Madrid's football over theirs every day of the week. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 16, 2018 9:06:31 GMT
Going from Jose to Simeone would be going backwards in both playing style and personality. I think i'd give up.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bestie on Mar 16, 2018 9:35:29 GMT
Simeone is probably the most obvious choice especially considering he's the closest to what we've already got now. I don't think completely going against your current style is the logical way to go either. He's been making positive noises about us in the press. Sounds like he's not interested in Chelsea anyway. He might ruffle a few of the snowflakes in our fan base mind ( which is a thumbs up from me). I dont want to get a manager with a possession based style similar to Pep, Van Gaal. It leaves me cold. Spurs probably have the best mix of tactics, entertaining but pretty good defensively. That's not me shouting out for Poch but that's the kind of football which is closer to what I like. I'd like a manager that would make us play like Citeh right now. They're far more direct than his Barca side. Doesn't make him less of a cunt, but no reason to deny the truth. I have to disagree to be honest. It's very similar to Guardiola's Barca team in that some of the final attacking play is so good it glosses over the dull, pass-pass-pass-pass-pass-pass-pass-pass, happening the rest of the time. |
|
|
|
Post by Rustin Cohle on Mar 16, 2018 9:42:43 GMT
I'd like a manager that would make us play like Citeh right now. They're far more direct than his Barca side. Doesn't make him less of a cunt, but no reason to deny the truth. I have to disagree to be honest. It's very similar to Guardiola's Barca team in that some of the final attacking play is so good it glosses over the dull, pass-pass-pass-pass-pass-pass-pass-pass, happening the rest of the time. I agree with this. Like Karma, I prefer Madrid's football at it's peak - lightning fast, only focused on the goal, can hit you at any time. City's amazing attacking play is really impressive and if they were't City I'd enjoy watching it, but the dull midfield play (until KDB produces some magic) is boring. Liverpool annoyingly play quite good football too, though the shiteness of their midfield and defence definitely takes the gloss off of it. I think Spurs play the best football in the PL, and by some margin TBH. That's not a call for Pochettino to come in tomorrow, I understand and agree with many of the criticisms against him, but I really do believe they play the most aesthetically pleasing football the league has seen since Fergie left (and even then the last couple of years were good, but not peak Fergie). |
|
"United’s flag is deepest red, it shrouded all our Munich dead. Before their limbs grew stiff and cold, their heart’s blood dyed it’s ev’ry fold. Then raise United’s banner high, beneath it’s shade we’ll live and die. So keep the faith and never fear." 
