4-4-2 or 4-3-3?

[Rio's Back Pocket]

442 for me. Unless Fergie actually buy's a midfielder capable of holding the team together in a 433 formation.

[JoshReddevilz]

4 -4-2 for me aswell. we play best in that formation and it allows Gary Neville to push up more

[onenedkelly]

Like he did last night? He looked terrible goin forward

reddevilz said:

4 -4-2 for me aswell. we play best in that formation and it allows Gary Neville to push up more

[onenedkelly]

And iM not taking part in the poll till I see who we sign

onenedkelly said:

Like he did last night? He looked terrible goin forward

reddevilz said:

4 -4-2 for me aswell. we play best in that formation and it allows Gary Neville to push up more

[onenedkelly]

Gone for other on the basis Im not sure till I see whom we sign

onenedkelly said:

And iM not taking part in the poll till I see who we sign

onenedkelly said:

Like he did last night? He looked terrible goin forward

[take me home]

I dont think its as simple as 4-4-2 or 4-3-3. Personally i think we can succeed with both formations using different players. What we must stop doing is using formations which mean we had men playing out of position.

[rewdie]

442 until we are in a position to experiment....say 1t with 10 points between us nd the chavs =D until then, lets stick to what works? Though id like to see a formation allowing Ronaldo to play the same way he does for Portugal

[Crilly]

punkfootball said:

mufcadz said:

For me it's the tried and tested 4-4-2. Some people are saying use 4-3-3 because Chelsea and Barcelona do. So what of they do at 4-3-3 United looked abysmal and Wazza was taken completely out of the game.

United are at their best with 4-4-2, did you hear the chants coming from the Stretford End early in the season, I think they were: ''Four Four Two''

[glow=red,2,300]Were not chelsea or Barca

WERE MANCHESTER UNITED[/glow]

EXACTLY and neither would we ever fuckin want to be!!!!!!!!!


4 4 2
4 4 2
442
4 4 2
4 4 2
four four two
four four two