|
|
Post by Busby Boy on May 29, 2006 16:44:55 GMT
For me it's the tried and tested 4-4-2. Some people are saying use 4-3-3 because Chelsea and Barcelona do. So what of they do at 4-3-3 United looked abysmal and Wazza was taken completely out of the game.
United are at their best with 4-4-2, did you hear the chants coming from the Stretford End early in the season, I think they were: ''Four Four Two''
|
|
|
|
Post by Busby Boy on May 29, 2006 16:46:22 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Dizzy on May 29, 2006 17:41:00 GMT
It has to be 4-4-2, no questions asked.
|
|
|
|
Post by Scott on May 29, 2006 18:11:44 GMT
For me, it depends on whether we have Ruud or next season. With Ruud, only 442, but with Saha, I reckon 433 could work. It worked in the 04-05 season without him.
|
|
|
|
Post by mancunian on May 29, 2006 19:06:37 GMT
i think great teams must adapt to different systems, I rembere teams worked out how to play against us when we had just two in centre midfield.
And especially in the Champions league we looked better on a number of occassions with three in the middle.
|
|
luke chadwick
United Reserve Player
Past - King Eric; Present - El Apache
Posts: 280
|
Post by luke chadwick on May 29, 2006 19:26:34 GMT
Agree with Scott. If Ruud´s still here, I love to see 4-4-3 with Saha just behind Rooney and Van Horselhead. Have been waiting for Ferguson to experiment with this. Otherwise, let´s stick with the 4-4-2
|
|
redseven
United Reserve Player
you wanna mess with me?
Posts: 316
|
Post by redseven on May 29, 2006 21:05:06 GMT
4-4-2...i know times have changed, but manchester united have always been and will always be at their best with it...its tried and tested
|
|
|
|
Post by 2olegend on May 29, 2006 22:07:50 GMT
4-3-3 automatically reverts into 4-5-1 which was the cause of our dull, boring and non-united like performances in the first half of this season! its a daft tactic and not fit for our squad...4-4-2 without a fucking doubt!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Red from the heat on May 29, 2006 23:28:53 GMT
4.4.2. It so much easier to play from the wings with this formation. It also helps with the overlapping runs. With three forwards it just seems to crowd the center of the pitch.
|
|
|
|
Post by 7even on May 30, 2006 0:52:23 GMT
It all depends on who we get rid of and who we bring in. It’s no good reverting to certain tactics when it doesn’t benefit the players we’ve got. We can’t go wasting talent
|
|
|
|
Post by Scott on May 30, 2006 1:59:55 GMT
4.4.2. It so much easier to play from the wings with this formation. It also helps with the overlapping runs. With three forwards it just seems to crowd the center of the pitch. When we played with Giggs, Rooney and Ronaldo last season for a couple of months when Ruud was injured, we were on fire. Scoring every game, playing great free flowing football. I imagine the same could happen with Saha, Rooney and Ronaldo... For the most part, I agree though. I like a good old fashioned 442, and dont feel United are really in the position to piss around with formations. |
|
|
|
Post by Sky Sports 1 on May 30, 2006 8:50:16 GMT
4-4-2, not really willing to try 4-3-3 again and continually fail with it like the start of this season  Although 4-3-3 has worked time and again against Arsenal that just proves it works much better in europe, it can't take the pace of the premiership with its lack of width or the amount of work the players have to do to close down the space on the flanks, which doesn't allow Rooney to create as he's always tracking back. It's a completely different style of football your asking them to play, which their not suited to playing, their league isn't suited to playing, it is already tried, tested and failed. Forget about it. United have played 4-4-2 for years, its always worked, never changed it and always suceeded. |
|
redseven
United Reserve Player
you wanna mess with me?
Posts: 316
|
Post by redseven on May 30, 2006 10:59:38 GMT
exactly, why fix something if it aint broken?
|
|
|
|
Post by onenedkelly on May 30, 2006 11:04:48 GMT
Why change it? To compete against the best whom incidently do use it, like 7even says it TOTALLY depends on whom we bring into the midfield, Rooney, Saha n Ronaldo up front would cause defences no end of trouble but it depends who will be doin the job behind them exactly, why fix something if it aint broken? |
|
|
|
Post by punkfootball on May 30, 2006 19:56:41 GMT
For me it's the tried and tested 4-4-2. Some people are saying use 4-3-3 because Chelsea and Barcelona do. So what of they do at 4-3-3 United looked abysmal and Wazza was taken completely out of the game. United are at their best with 4-4-2, did you hear the chants coming from the Stretford End early in the season, I think they were: ''Four Four Two'' Were not chelsea or Barca WERE MANCHESTER UNITED |
|
