|
|
Post by fergieswarriors on Jun 2, 2006 15:49:55 GMT
bit old but he wud surely improve our midfield alot. we hav been linked with him wud not mind him and another 1 or 2 younger midfielders and Ribery!
|
|
|
|
Post by fergieswarriors on Jun 2, 2006 16:59:58 GMT
no one?
|
|
|
|
Post by andyt1110 on Jun 2, 2006 17:26:40 GMT
Our main problem is an ageing midfield, Scholes and Giggs are losing their powers, Keane-o was well on the decline when he left, we need young blood with energy and hunger for the game, yes that will bring inexperience but Scholesy, Giggs and other senior players will look after them, I don't think Emerson would be a good choice
|
|
|
|
Post by Busby Boy on Jun 2, 2006 18:09:02 GMT
No thanks, would be good in the short-term. United need to sign long-term players because one, we need to look to the future as well as the present and we haven't got the money to be replacing signings who will only be around for 2-3 years, we're not BOLTON!
|
|
sfyyaz
United Youth Teamer
Posts: 243
|
Post by sfyyaz on Jun 2, 2006 19:34:52 GMT
lol, yeah it seems Chelsea are going for hte quick fix, though they have signed youth preiously, it appears that a lot of the youth may move on - carlton Cole (scott Parker b4) etc.
With us,w e don'thav ehte funds to keep shelling out on big names, we need to buy a great player, and he has to be young so as to allow investement elsewhere, we can't be spending 15mil on a CM every 2 seasons!
|
|
