redrossi
United Youth Teamer
F**K LIVERPOOL
Posts: 28
|
6 subs
Jun 3, 2006 17:17:04 GMT
Post by redrossi on Jun 3, 2006 17:17:04 GMT
I think the FA should raise the the maximum number of substitutes to 6 because 5 just isn't enough
Your thoughts?
|
|
|
|
6 subs
Jun 3, 2006 20:08:01 GMT
Post by Dizzy on Jun 3, 2006 20:08:01 GMT
I can't really see whats wrong with things the way they are now.
|
|
|
|
6 subs
Jun 3, 2006 20:09:08 GMT
Post by JoshReddevilz on Jun 3, 2006 20:09:08 GMT
yh, i think 5 is enough,
|
|
|
|
6 subs
Jun 3, 2006 21:53:49 GMT
Post by Busby Boy on Jun 3, 2006 21:53:49 GMT
I know don't change nothing...but I would change the subs bench to 7 for CUP FINALS. Because there are possibilites of extra-time and pens. Obviously only 3 used though!
|
|
Crilly
United Reserve Player
I'm not gonna hurt ya, Alfie!
Posts: 377
|
6 subs
Jun 4, 2006 12:05:15 GMT
Post by Crilly on Jun 4, 2006 12:05:15 GMT
No way! 5 is probaly too many as it is. Its an 11 v 11 game. Subs were only introduced to provide cover for injuries.
Too much American influence has seen it raise to three and now five. ie having options to change tactics and systems every ten minutes like they do in Basketball, American Football.
Leave it at five, although three was plenty, I do admit it as made for a more exciting game having more options, but a line needs to be drawn.
If we let other influences continue to change the rules, next thing you know we will be having 4 quarters instead of 2 halfs, and sponsorship breaks every time there is a throw-in.
|
|
|
|
6 subs
Jun 4, 2006 13:25:08 GMT
Post by Red Yank on Jun 4, 2006 13:25:08 GMT
No way! 5 is probaly too many as it is. Its an 11 v 11 game. Subs were only introduced to provide cover for injuries. Too much American influence has seen it raise to three and now five. ie having options to change tactics and systems every ten minutes like they do in Basketball, American Football. Leave it at five, although three was plenty, I do admit it as made for a more exciting game having more options, but a line needs to be drawn. If we let other influences continue to change the rules, next thing you know we will be having 4 quarters instead of 2 halfs, and sponsorship breaks every time there is a throw-in. Hey leave the states out of this....lol  Seriously though I don't see what the need is for 6 subs, because 5 gives any team a good amount of options...and I'm certainly NOT in favor of changing the format to quarters or having any commercials disrupt the game. If you must show them then do it at half time; the one thing that irritates me about most U.S. sports is the constant back and forth from the game to advertising time. |
|
stretfordend99
United Youth Teamer
Kiss the badge all you want Gaz! we'll love ya for it, Scousers'll hate ya for it....BONUS
Posts: 139
|
6 subs
Jun 7, 2006 21:31:30 GMT
Post by stretfordend99 on Jun 7, 2006 21:31:30 GMT
lol if there were more than 5 subs then it would give chelsea more room for signing more bench warmers.
|
|
|
|
6 subs
Jun 7, 2006 21:57:55 GMT
Post by neville4president on Jun 7, 2006 21:57:55 GMT
me thinks do like Italy and Spain and have 7
|
|
lloydm
United School Boy
Posts: 11
|
6 subs
Jun 8, 2006 22:52:53 GMT
Post by lloydm on Jun 8, 2006 22:52:53 GMT
nar theres no need
|
|
|
|
6 subs
Jun 11, 2006 22:08:23 GMT
Post by sahahaha on Jun 11, 2006 22:08:23 GMT
7 Subs would play right into Chelsea's hands.
|
|
|
|
6 subs
Jun 11, 2006 22:26:37 GMT
Post by Red Yank on Jun 11, 2006 22:26:37 GMT
7 Subs would play right into Chelsea's hands. yeah, it'll mean some of those 15 midfielders might actually see the bench at Stamford Bridge instead of practicing sprints while fetching Mourinho coffee... |
|
|
|
6 subs
Jun 14, 2006 12:36:01 GMT
Post by Vidic>Superman on Jun 14, 2006 12:36:01 GMT
yh more subs for every1 except chelsea and liverpool
|
|
