|
|
Post by alt on Feb 24, 2013 22:24:35 GMT
Perfect player for us but as people have said, highly doubt it'll happen. I'd happily pay £50m for him but sadly I don't think he'd leave, or at least not for a few seasons.
|
|
|
|
Post by jimbonda on Feb 24, 2013 22:53:38 GMT
i got mocked a few months or so back for posting that i'd pay 40 mil for him. in fact i got mocked for the heinous crime of actually rating him as a player.
|
|
sleel6
United Bench Warmer
Posts: 846
|
Post by sleel6 on Feb 25, 2013 1:21:44 GMT
He won't leave Arsenal but if he did become available I wouldn't be spending 40mill on him.
There are better midfielders than Wilshere that wouldn't cost that much.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 25, 2013 8:49:19 GMT
i got mocked a few months or so back for posting that i'd pay 40 mil for him. in fact i got mocked for the heinous crime of actually rating him as a player. Shame on you Jimbo  |
|
|
|
Post by alt on Feb 25, 2013 11:55:26 GMT
He won't leave Arsenal but if he did become available I wouldn't be spending 40mill on him. There are better midfielders than Wilshere that wouldn't cost that much. Please enlighten us... |
|
|
|
Post by alt on Feb 25, 2013 12:29:33 GMT
i got mocked a few months or so back for posting that i'd pay 40 mil for him. in fact i got mocked for the heinous crime of actually rating him as a player. Certainly wasn't me. I think there are a select few players out there who you'd pay a lot of money for, either the already world class ones, or the younger type who you are know are going to reach that level. For me he's already a top player and you know he'll reach the very highest level in the next few years (baring injury). Not a huge fan of this #10 role for Arsenal he seems to be playing quite a lot at the moment, would much rather have him play as a traditional box to box midfielder. His performances against Brazil and Barcelona are great to watch and also gives England hope in the future. Sadly I don't think this will ever happen but fingers crossed! |
|
|
|
Post by mocthezuma on Feb 25, 2013 12:30:31 GMT
He's a good player, but he's not going to leave Arsenal. I don't see any reason to ponder about this. It's as likely as Cleverly going to them. Won't happen.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jayrannasaurus on Feb 25, 2013 12:49:46 GMT
He won't leave Arsenal but if he did become available I wouldn't be spending 40mill on him. There are better midfielders than Wilshere that wouldn't cost that much. Please enlighten us... You mean, name midfielders that are better than Wilshere that wouldn't cost 40 million? I reckon there are a fair few, the only reason he'd cost that much is because he's English. |
|
|
|
Post by ScholesEvilTwin on Feb 25, 2013 13:23:59 GMT
i got mocked a few months or so back for posting that i'd pay 40 mil for him. in fact i got mocked for the heinous crime of actually rating him as a player. The mocking had nothing to do with the fact that he had spent over a year out of football through injury then? |
|
|
|
Post by jimbonda on Feb 25, 2013 15:39:36 GMT
i got mocked a few months or so back for posting that i'd pay 40 mil for him. in fact i got mocked for the heinous crime of actually rating him as a player. The mocking had nothing to do with the fact that he had spent over a year out of football through injury then? no, it was because it wasn't tom cleverley i was hyping up. |
|
sleel6
United Bench Warmer
Posts: 846
|
Post by sleel6 on Feb 26, 2013 9:20:14 GMT
He won't leave Arsenal but if he did become available I wouldn't be spending 40mill on him. There are better midfielders than Wilshere that wouldn't cost that much. Please enlighten us... Schweinsteiger, Vidal, Gotze. Not many, but there is a few. |
|
sleel6
United Bench Warmer
Posts: 846
|
Post by sleel6 on Feb 26, 2013 9:22:05 GMT
The mocking had nothing to do with the fact that he had spent over a year out of football through injury then? no, it was because it wasn't tom cleverley i was hyping up. Do you think Clevs has what it takes Jim? |
|
|
|
Post by Bestie on Feb 26, 2013 9:56:46 GMT
i got mocked a few months or so back for posting that i'd pay 40 mil for him. in fact i got mocked for the heinous crime of actually rating him as a player. The mocking had nothing to do with the fact that he had spent over a year out of football through injury then? Also nothing to do with the fact that actually jim didn't get mocked at all for rating Wilshere as a player. Schweinsteiger, Vidal, Gotze. Not many, but there is a few. Yeah, they would all likely cost about £ 40 million. Schweiny maybe less because he's older. |
|
|
|
Post by Bestie on Feb 26, 2013 9:58:06 GMT
no, it was because it wasn't tom cleverley i was hyping up. Do you think Clevs has what it takes Jim? I can answer that, for jim. Cleverley is a good work-horse, a 6 out of 10 player, will pass the ball about a bit but won't ever be something special. He isn't going to create goals or win games. |
|
|
|
Post by jimbonda on Feb 26, 2013 10:33:45 GMT
Do you think Clevs has what it takes Jim? I can answer that, for jim. Cleverley is a good work-horse, a 6 out of 10 player, will pass the ball about a bit but won't ever be something special. He isn't going to create goals or win games. slee, defo think he's got what it takes mate, as far as having a future at the club and making a good contribution. will he ever be a fixture in the side though? i'm not so sure. not bad one_love, not fully accurate though. he is a good all-round player, and i'm waiting on that other stuff, as oppose to adamant he's not capable of it. as for the wilshere business....how apt of you to pipe up here since you were the most prolific with the indignation and the digs. i've always been honest with my opinion of both players, and now that the consensus is growing that wilshere would be a star here my opinion doesn't seem so out of place and it looks like you now agree yourself. maybe if you'd not been so reactionary in the first place we'd not have had the to and fro. |
|
