|
Post by bushy1987 on Aug 27, 2024 17:01:21 GMT
Why would we want another 30 year old on big wages on what he wants probably a 3 year deal, makes zero sense to us, we fucked up with the wages we gave Sancho but that doesn't mean we need to do it again with sterling and would have zero chance of moving him on in 12 months time, it's a terrible deal all around.
|
|
|
Post by johnboy14 on Aug 27, 2024 17:09:41 GMT
Why would we want another 30 year old on big wages on what he wants probably a 3 year deal, makes zero sense to us, we fucked up with the wages we gave Sancho but that doesn't mean we need to do it again with sterling and would have zero chance of moving him on in 12 months time, it's a terrible deal all around. Can't believe this deal. Sterling is fucking shit and has been since he left city. Don't understand how this is a move in the right direction.
|
|
|
Post by Paul on Aug 27, 2024 17:17:08 GMT
It's a deal that benefits Chelsea more than it does us. Send him to Juve and get Coman on a loan.
Has to be another option but to swap one useless cunt for a player that doesn't offer much more than what we have now. Plus he's 5 years old and on similar wages.
|
|
|
Post by johnboy14 on Aug 27, 2024 17:18:20 GMT
Sterling is better than Antony and Rashford right now. If it would allow us to get rid of Sancho, I'd be okay with Sterling coming on a short-term deal on reasonable wages. It won't be reasonable, it'll be 250k a week minimum. It's a panic buy like em all.
|
|
|
Post by bushy1987 on Aug 27, 2024 17:26:13 GMT
Sterling is better than Antony and Rashford right now. If it would allow us to get rid of Sancho, I'd be okay with Sterling coming on a short-term deal on reasonable wages. It won't be reasonable, it'll be 250k a week minimum. It's a panic buy like em all. Yeah it's a wank deal, I mean Chelsea have like 500 players fuck taking their cast offs if they actually want Sancho then just say we want nkunku (just throwing his name about) actually swap for a similar age/profile ect to make it worth our worthwhile.
|
|
|
Post by johnboy14 on Aug 27, 2024 17:37:09 GMT
It won't be reasonable, it'll be 250k a week minimum. It's a panic buy like em all. Yeah it's a wank deal, I mean Chelsea have like 500 players fuck taking their cast offs if they actually want Sancho then just say we want nkunku (just throwing his name about) actually swap for a similar age/profile ect to make it worth our worthwhile. Is it a direct swap? If so that's bollocks
|
|
|
Post by gdmm on Aug 27, 2024 17:38:39 GMT
Sterling thing is gaining more traction this afternoon No.
|
|
|
Post by Stretty on Aug 27, 2024 17:41:33 GMT
Why would we want another 30 year old on big wages on what he wants probably a 3 year deal, makes zero sense to us, we fucked up with the wages we gave Sancho but that doesn't mean we need to do it again with sterling and would have zero chance of moving him on in 12 months time, it's a terrible deal all around. Can't believe this deal. Sterling is fucking shit and has been since he left city. Don't understand how this is a move in the right direction. This Ineos are doing a fine job in shifting out overpaid shite so the last think they needs to do is a like for like replacement. big no from me.
|
|
|
Post by ratbag on Aug 27, 2024 17:44:07 GMT
Hoping this is just some lazy journalism…
|
|
|
Post by kingkobbie on Aug 27, 2024 17:47:03 GMT
What is the deal that people are saying is bad? Do we know the terms?
All I've seen is that United have said any deal will be on their terms.
|
|
|
Post by bushy1987 on Aug 27, 2024 17:48:17 GMT
What is the deal that people are saying is bad? Do we know the terms? All I've seen is that United have said any deal will be on their terms. The deal that is bad is bringing a shit sterling to the club
|
|
|
Post by safariRed on Aug 27, 2024 17:54:22 GMT
Get Sterling and it's a 3/10 window.
Fuck Erik if he thinks he can get more from a Klopp/Pep/Maresca reject.
I truly hope it's just a filthy rumour
|
|
|
Post by anti_social on Aug 27, 2024 18:36:29 GMT
Sterling would just be a completely bizarre deal, and entirely at odds with everything the new regime has done so far. Even as a way to offload Sancho it sucks; why get rid of a lazy no-mark with a has-been on unjustifiable wages?
Previously we'd have signed no-one by now, maybe offloaded Martial, and we'd go in with a £75m bid for Sterling on the last day of the window in a desperate attempt to keep the fans happy. This deal just can't happen now, it has to be clickbait journalism as we approach the end of the window.
|
|
|
Post by Kamilo on Aug 27, 2024 18:50:17 GMT
Can’t see it with INEOS either. Glazers? Yes all day.
|
|
|
Post by kingkobbie on Aug 27, 2024 19:02:58 GMT
What is the deal that people are saying is bad? Do we know the terms? All I've seen is that United have said any deal will be on their terms. The deal that is bad is bringing a shit sterling to the club Sadly, he is better than Sancho, Rashford, and Antony. Seems unlikely this will happen in any event. And if it does happen, I'm confident we wouldn't do anything financially stupid.
|
|