Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 28, 2013 12:21:39 GMT
I watched a parody on youtube about that last night- |
|
|
|
Post by Jayrannasaurus on Feb 28, 2013 12:29:55 GMT
I'd say the only way any of us would take this is if we were to re-invest the cash and it totalled something ridiculous like 60 mil or something. Get Lewa (<20 Mil) and Bale (40-50 mil) and that should fill any lingering void people may feel from Wazza's departure whilst making us, arguably, one of the strongest teams in Europe. Then we'd all wake up to find it was all a dream and we've re-signed Gibson on loan.  |
|
|
|
Post by Bestie on Feb 28, 2013 12:42:36 GMT
I did laugh for a good while at that.
|
|
|
|
Post by SAF_Legend on Feb 28, 2013 21:18:45 GMT
I digress... but technically, isn't "Me and my friend" not wrong? It's just polite to put others before you and that's why it's "My friend and I" isn't it? - Read it somewhere off the internet so could be wrong, although I have always been using the latter.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 1, 2013 7:37:47 GMT
I digress... but technically, isn't "Me and my friend" not wrong? It's just polite to put others before you and that's why it's "My friend and I" isn't it? - Read it somewhere off the internet so could be wrong, although I have always been using the latter. this explains perfectly |
|
|
|
Post by SAF_Legend on Mar 1, 2013 9:25:18 GMT
I digress... but technically, isn't "Me and my friend" not wrong? It's just polite to put others before you and that's why it's "My friend and I" isn't it? - Read it somewhere off the internet so could be wrong, although I have always been using the latter. this explains perfectly I love that video lol. Collegehumor makes really funny stuff. It (at the minute mark of the video) explains how to remember how to say it correctly - but doesn't explain why though. Arguably, "Me and my friend" isn't actually wrong as they could form a subject, couldn't they? Therefore, "Me and my friend thought Mancini was full of shit and piss" isn't wrong - or is it? If you follow the video, does that make "I and my friend" right then? - if you remove "and my friend" the sentence becomes "I thought Mancini was full of shit and piss"... which isn't wrong. I think this actually boils down to sounding rude, as you should put others you like before you as part of being polite, and maybe nothing to do with being grammatically correct or not. This website seems to agree with me: wordwatchtowers.wordpress.com/2010/02/07/my-friends-and-i-or-me-and-my-friends/ |
|
|
|
Post by aussiegraham on Mar 2, 2013 21:57:45 GMT
I have nothing to add to the discussion as down here we say "me and me mate" which is pure 'stralian!
|
|
|
|
Post by jimbonda on Mar 2, 2013 23:16:14 GMT
...and i'm fixing to get plastered
but the beer is crook and the birds all look like you u pommie bastard~!
|
|
|
|
Post by aussiegraham on Mar 4, 2013 1:46:38 GMT
...and i'm fixing to get plastered but the beer is crook and the birds all look like you u pommie bastard~! 'stralia is a lovely place, Full of bonza blokes, Sheila's, beer, and no-ones queer, Except in Pommy jokes! |
|
|
|
Post by Dan United on Mar 6, 2013 9:36:57 GMT
Well I expect this thread to challenge the Sneijder thread for longevity after last night.
|
|
|
|
Post by jimbonda on Mar 6, 2013 13:27:21 GMT
it's not unlike Ferguson to make strange omissions in european games, he used to do it with Hughes in the early days and he's made strange selections now and then throughout his whole tenure, sometimes rightly and sometimes wrongly depending on the result.
you'd have to say pre-red card the selection was working last night. i doubt he's planning on moving rooney on, but you never know.
|
|
|
|
Post by Stew on Mar 6, 2013 13:59:24 GMT
Benzema is a top player, he didn't start last night either. I hope Rooney doesn't leave, love him as a player but who knows? There is a bit of a pattern, Becks vs Madrid, Ruud in the league cup final. Hope not though.
|
|
|
|
Post by SAF_Legend on Mar 6, 2013 14:47:18 GMT
I thought maybe the plan was to bring Rooney on at around 60, 65th min to shore up work rate and fire power. Obviously, we brought him in in the end, but in a different situation than what we might have in mind.
Thought it would have worked as well.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kamilo on Mar 6, 2013 14:52:07 GMT
I thought maybe the plan was to bring Rooney on at around 60, 65th min to shore up work rate and fire power. Obviously, we brought him in in the end, but in a different situation than what we might have in mind. Thought it would have worked as well. 11 v 11 I quite liked that tactic. I think if you put on Kagawa and Rooney when we are 1-0 up the game would be in the bag. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 6, 2013 14:56:52 GMT
Fed up of these "rooneys not happy" or "Rooney wants to leave" bullshit stories.
FUCK OFF!!!!!
|
|
