|
|
Post by redcase on Sept 3, 2013 18:17:41 GMT
Goodness the Coentrao deal was shocking . Id say it would be a coup if we got it done . Probably use him as a winger . Well we cant blame Moyes thats for sure . But some one has to take account for this absurdness that the world witnessed . If you Guys think Moyes is responsible , Id say I dont agree at all . IMO hes a nobody right now . Making his way up the ladder even though hes boss . Hel learn though . Gerardo Martino is also a nobody. He is more of a nobody than Moyes. But they signed Neymar. Manchester City signed 3 players without having a bloody manager. Point is that managers should just point and shoot and not bother about the financial aspect of it all. That should be the job of a football minded Chairman or President or CEO. Instead we are saddled with a fucking yes-man nobody who is more interested in getting the local chippy to sponsor Manchester United rather than bring good players into the squad. The sponsorships work only if the fucking club is successful Ed , you stupid thick cunt . |
|
aaronds
United Youth Teamer
your job is to get behind our new manager
Posts: 37 
|
Post by aaronds on Sept 3, 2013 18:21:21 GMT
I rearly hope now after we have signed fellaini that giggs game time is limited to zero, and no we have a bit of muscle in cm maybe we can give kags a chance in the advanced role now and play some good football again. we would all love that . But I think Giggs hass to decide himself too . I think he thinks hes able to influence the game better than some others . Till he feels he cant make a contribution , hes gona be heavily involved . No doubt about it !!! P.s Fellaini will get us stability in midfield , maybe not dazzling performances but cultured performances similar to Fletcher hopefully , |
|
|
|
Post by Tatty on Sept 3, 2013 21:07:00 GMT
Coentrao wasn't our fault. EVERYTHING was done, all it needed was a signature at Real's end. They pulled out because they couldn't get Siquera. I dunno what their beef is though, they just spunked £85mill on a left back...
|
|
|
|
Post by Bestie on Sept 3, 2013 21:29:34 GMT
Goodness the Coentrao deal was shocking . Id say it would be a coup if we got it done . Probably use him as a winger . Well we cant blame Moyes thats for sure . But some one has to take account for this absurdness that the world witnessed . If you Guys think Moyes is responsible , Id say I dont agree at all . IMO hes a nobody right now . Making his way up the ladder even though hes boss . Hel learn though . Gerardo Martino is also a nobody. He is more of a nobody than Moyes. But they signed Neymar. Manchester City signed 3 players without having a bloody manager. Point is that managers should just point and shoot and not bother about the financial aspect of it all. That should be the job of a football minded Chairman or President or CEO. Instead we are saddled with a fucking yes-man nobody who is more interested in getting the local chippy to sponsor Manchester United rather than bring good players into the squad. The sponsorships work only if the fucking club is successful Ed , you stupid thick cunt . Dinnat be daft man! How could a local chippy benefit our merchandising, uh, I mean fanbase, in Asian and other global markets?! |
|
|
|
Post by JamBritRed on Sept 3, 2013 21:55:39 GMT
taken from the usually funny Dirty tackle:
"...It could've been much, much worse for Woodward and Moyes, though. At least they didn't misplace Patrice Evra's internal organs or sell Old Trafford for magic beans. They could have decapitated the Sir Alex Ferguson statue while looking for more money and given Robin van Persie back to Arsenal just because it was "the right thing to do." They didn't do any of that. A perfect four for four there. So they've got that going for them."
i made the obvious adjustment. the earlier part was just unnecessarily painful reading. this last part did make me chuckle a bit though.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 3, 2013 21:58:24 GMT
so we've got no #9 or #7?
FFS they better be bringing Ronaldo in Jan along with his identical twin brother who will get #9
|
|
|
|
Post by Ole's Red Whiteknight03 Army on Sept 3, 2013 23:05:32 GMT
so we've got no #9 or #7? FFS they better be bringing Ronaldo in Jan along with his identical twin brother who will get #9 It's somewhat fitting given the makeup of our squad though. Kagawa could be a 9 I suppose, but the absence of two iconic numbers does point out the deficiencies in our squad/transfer activities. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 3, 2013 23:14:00 GMT
Squad numbers mean bollock all these days.
We don't have a number 9, yes we do. He's called Hernandez, and he's a very typical number 9, a clinical, play on the shoulder of the last defender, finisher. So he doesn't have an actual number 9 on the back of his shirt, so what? It's not like we couldn't give it to him is it?
We don't have a number 7 either. What should that be? A great attacking player? A game changer? A scorer of important goals, ala Ronaldo or Cantona? Think you'll find you've just described Robin Van Persie there. Again, because he doesn't actually wear the number 7 shirt we should rush out and buy someone to have it instead?
Squad numbers:
1 -De Gea
2 -Rafael
3 -Evra
4 -Carrick
5 -Ferdinand
6 -Vidic
7 -Van Persie
8 -Fellaini
9 -Hernandez
10 -Rooney
11 -Giggs
There you go, not hard is it? Change 10 or 11 to Kagawa or 8 to Cleverley if it makes you happier. But Christ on a pogo stick talk about looking for anything to whinge about at the moment, so for whatever reason those 2 numbers haven't been allocated, making out that they're vacant because we don't have the players available to fill them is absurd.
|
|
|
|
Post by SAF_Legend on Sept 3, 2013 23:20:26 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Chris on Sept 4, 2013 5:16:07 GMT
Glad to say that this is now locked. Good riddance.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 4, 2013 7:46:59 GMT
Squad numbers mean bollock all these days. We don't have a number 9, yes we do. He's called Hernandez, and he's a very typical number 9, a clinical, play on the shoulder of the last defender, finisher. So he doesn't have an actual number 9 on the back of his shirt, so what? It's not like we couldn't give it to him is it? We don't have a number 7 either. What should that be? A great attacking player? A game changer? A scorer of important goals, ala Ronaldo or Cantona? Think you'll find you've just described Robin Van Persie there. Again, because he doesn't actually wear the number 7 shirt we should rush out and buy someone to have it instead? Squad numbers: 1 -De Gea 2 -Rafael 3 -Evra 4 -Carrick 5 -Ferdinand 6 -Vidic 7 -Van Persie 8 -Fellaini 9 -Hernandez 10 -Rooney 11 -Giggs There you go, not hard is it? Change 10 or 11 to Kagawa or 8 to Cleverley if it makes you happier. But Christ on a pogo stick talk about looking for anything to whinge about at the moment, so for whatever reason those 2 numbers haven't been allocated, making out that they're vacant because we don't have the players available to fill them is absurd. I actually want to say WHAT? Hernandez is number 14. It is irrelevant if you believe him to be a number 9 .... his actual shirt number is number 14 |
|
