|
|
Post by traffordbrown on Nov 29, 2012 17:18:21 GMT
Sometimes a good player can stagnate at a club. Need to move on before he'll develop any further.
For this reason, a Sneijder/Nani swap might well work for all parties.
|
|
|
|
Post by fletchabey on Nov 29, 2012 17:24:37 GMT
Sneijder ship has long sailed methinks. In a similar parallel to our recent Dutch acquisition, it would need to be a situation that would force a lower fee for it to be definitely worthwhile. Though he'd still be far riskier than RVP ever was, at least he's already at home in Premier league.
Also the other big difference was RVP forced his way out to come here even ignoring a supposed 300k a week from City in the process. Sneijder had his chance but didn't push for it. I bet he regrets that after the poor season Inter had last year.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rene Meulensteen on Nov 29, 2012 19:37:25 GMT
Would you accept a Nani swap for Sneijder if it came about? Would be a plausable solution IMHO. Andos latest performances seem to suggest he's earned himself another season which is lucky IMO. Id swap Nani for a fucking Wheelie bin at the moment. Legend! |
|
sleel6
United Bench Warmer
Posts: 846
|
Post by sleel6 on Dec 2, 2012 8:24:37 GMT
I think Nani's 'injury' is an excuse not to play him, I expect him to be sold in January, tbh.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jayrannasaurus on Dec 12, 2012 7:41:47 GMT
 pretty interesting that last stat. |
|
|
|
Post by Stew on Dec 12, 2012 9:15:26 GMT
I think we may well go for Wanayama. Not sure we'll do much else. Maybe Rodriguez from Porto if Nani goes.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 12, 2012 11:03:44 GMT
Were being linked with Walcott now as well. No fucking thankyou. Just an over rated version of what we have in Nani. Only player from Arsenal Id want to replace him is Oxlaide Chamberlain
|
|
|
|
Post by Jayrannasaurus on Dec 12, 2012 11:09:01 GMT
 Yeah I saw a rumor mentioning a Walcott swap deal for Nani where we pay an extra 10 mil, haha! |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 12, 2012 11:11:51 GMT
We sign Walcott then were just going backwards. He wants to leave Arsenal the same reason Nani wants to leave us, Money. Thus making him a money grabbing cunt. We don't want one of them. Id rather have Sneijder, Isco, Wanyama, Ince or Zaha.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bestie on Dec 12, 2012 11:58:15 GMT
Basically, Walcott scores better but Nani assists waaaay better.
So which is more valuable? Paying particular attention to the fact we have Robin van Persie, Danny Welbeck, Javi Hernandez and Wayne Rooney to score chances.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 12, 2012 12:14:49 GMT
Its Blue,
Its Square,
Walcott should be there.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 12, 2012 12:24:55 GMT
Neither Walcott or Nani are good enough for us. It will take pure quality to come in that will improve us. We shouldn't settle for middle of the road players. Let Liverscum pay way over the odds for these types. Im not sure we need another wide man if Nani leaves. I think we are OK out wide and I would be a much much happier camper if we invested in a top class central midfield player.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sky Sports 1 on Dec 12, 2012 17:05:26 GMT
If Nani leaves, we would have 2 wingers.
If we bought another central midfielder, we would have 7 central midfielders NOT including Rooney, kagawa or Powell.
We need to buy 2 wingers if Nani leaves. Rooney, Kagawa and Welbeck are not winger solutions in the long run.
|
|
|
|
Post by karthy on Dec 12, 2012 17:34:36 GMT
Lets go for Sterling ( purely to Wind up the cunts) and Rodri or Zaha.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dan United on Dec 12, 2012 17:57:12 GMT
There's also the issue that Walcott wants to play up top. That's not going to happen for us.
|
|
